The new interface is designed to present the user with exactly the information needed, as clearly as possible. It's brighter and cheerier than the old black, grey, and beige interface. There's still a "green for safe" status indicator, but based on focus groups and user interviews McAfee has added the reassurance "(no action required)" to this indicator. The status panel at the top offers quick access to information about scanning, updates, firewall, and subscription. Yes, I said firewall—while not a full suite, this antivirus comes with firewall protection. The status panel also presents a rotating set of statistics, among them the number of McAfee-protected PCs on the network and number of viruses detected during the last scan, with a link to a full security report.
All features are just a click or two away, and many can be reached via multiple routes. For example, the user can trigger an on-demand scan from the top panel or by clicking the Virus and Spyware Protection ribbon in the features area below. The "Navigation Center" offers yet another route to a full scan, along with access to less-used features.
Malware Interferes with Installation
Installing McAfee is a lengthy process, because the tiny installer always downloads the latest program code and virus signature data. For an average user, this is no big deal—especially for those who got McAfee pre-installed—but the necessary download did slow the installation process my twelve malware-infested test systems. On the plus side, the product was immediately ready on completion of the installation, with no need for an additional lengthy initial update. And the new UI appears instantly when invoked—that's a big change.
However, McAfee successfully installed and ran on just six of those twelve systems. On the other six, one problem or another prevented installation or blocked the installed program from doing its job. Fortunately, McAfee has a substantial set of tools to help in this situation. Unfortunately, getting all six problem systems fixed required every tool in the box.
The first step toward clearing up any problem is McAfee's Virtual Technician. This simple tool checks for problems with the product or, if no McAfee product is present, for problems that could interfere with installation. Virtual Technician cured one of the six problem systems.
McAfee offers a small anti-malware tool called Stinger that wipes out certain common threats without requiring a lengthy install process. Stinger found and removed threats on several of the remaining systems. After running it, I managed to install the product on two more systems, though it still wouldn't run on one of those two. McAfee's pre-scan preparation tool and online FreeScan solved a few more problems, but I still wound up with two stinkers. On one the product simply would not install; on the other it installed but would not run.
The starting-level technician crewing McAfee's online chat-based help system didn't manage to fix the last two, so I got escalated to McAfee's full-scale virus removal service. It took hours, but eventually the virus experts remote-controlling my sick systems managed to get McAfee installed and ready to scan.
If you're buying an antivirus to clean up a computer that you suspect (or know) is infested with malware, McAfee may not be the best choice to perform the initial cleanup. On the other hand, the wealth of ancillary repair tools, along with personal support, did deal with all the problems I encountered.
Good Test Scores
The big independent test labs have hordes of researchers and rooms full of test computers, all working to evaluate the efficacy of security software. McAfee did well in the latest tests, though it didn't take top honors.
AV-Test.org recently ran a real-world parallel test of a dozen security products over 60 days. Each product was confronted with the exact same very current malware samples daily and challenged to protect the test system. McAfee's scores were right in the middle for both detection and removal; Norton Internet Security 2010, Kaspersky Internet Security 2010 and PC Tools Internet Security 2010 were the most effective.
AV Comparatives ran a new test this year evaluating the performance impact of sixteen antivirus products. Over half the subjects, including McAfee, Norton and Kaspersky scored ADVANCED+ (the top rating), though McAfee did so with the lowest numeric score.
In the latest test of on-demand malware cleanup by AV-Comparatives, McAfee scored ADVANCED, and in their proactive test of non-signature-based detection it scored STANDARD, the lowest passing score. On the plus side, ICSA Labs and West Coast Labs both certified McAfee's technology for virus detection and removal, and West Coast Labs added several other checkmark certifications. McAfee has also received the VB 100% award from Virus Bulletin in all but one of their last ten Windows-based testing cycles.
Speedy Malware Scanner
Much of McAfee's malware detection abilities live "in the cloud." Called Active Protection, this online system gets a billion queries per day, so it has to be fast. A full scan of my standard clean system took 40 minutes, a little longer than the average of 30 minutes. However, due to McAfee's "smart scan" technology, a repeat scan took less than 10 minutes. Note that the product automatically configures a weekly scan, so even if you never manually launch a scan, the app will still clean up your system.
As noted, getting the product installed on all of my malware-infested test systems was a challenge. Even after that success, one system continued to cause trouble. McAfee's real-time protection detected a Trojan and requested a reboot to complete its removal. After reboot it did the exact same thing, again and again for as long as I could stand it. I finally ignored the prompt and let the full scan run to completion. That's annoying—a user would have to make a leap of faith that the app will eventually get the Trojan, and the average user isn't qualified to know whether that's a reasonable assumption.
The scanner removes Trojans, viruses, and other serious threats immediately on detecting them. For lower-risk items, termed "potentially unwanted programs," it asks what to do at the end of the scan. I always chose "Quarantine all." The scan occasionally requested a reboot to finish cleanup.
When the dust settled, I tallied up the results. McAfee scored 7.0 in the malware removal test, the same as Microsoft Security Essentials 1.0. That's just a bit above the average on this test. PC Tools holds the record with 8.3 points; Norton took 7.5.
In a separate test of removing commercial keyloggers McAfee scored 4.7 points. Norton did the best with 7.5 points and Double Anti-Spy Professional 1.4 scored 7.4. Not to worry; I don't consider this result nearly as important as the malware removal test.
Looking at rootkits, whether from the malware or keylogger collection, McAfee scored 6.0 points. It detected all of the samples, but it left some of them actively running. Norton scored highest against rootkits with 7.9 points; PC Tools came in second with 7.7. I also broke out a separate score defining McAfee's ability to remove scareware (rogue security software). With 5.8 points in this test it came in a fraction below average. Top scareware-remover was Ad-Aware Pro 8.1 8.8 points.
Overall, McAfee did a good job of malware removal, but other products have scored significantly better.
Powerful Real-time Protection
McAfee's protection for a clean system starts with SiteAdvisor, which warns when the site you're visiting has been identified as dangerous. This is just the free SiteAdvisor anybody can download; it doesn't include the ability to actually block access to dangerous sites the way SiteAdvisor Plus does. That means you must pay attention to its warnings and actively avoid sites it flags as dangerous.
When I tried to re-download my current collection of malware samples, SiteAdvisor warned about well over half of them, including those from many URLs that are no longer valid. What's the virtue of that? Well, it will certainly make you think twice about the e-mail or Web page from which you obtained the now-defunct bad link!
SiteAdvisor now interacts with Active Protection online, which makes it much more responsive. In the past, its ratings were global to a domain and got updated only when the service's Web-crawlers re-examined that domain. Now it can get updated immediately when Active Protection detects malware coming from a site, and can also fine-tune ratings to specific URLs, not just entire domains. I can see the difference–it wasn't nearly as effective last year.
McAfee also checks every download and pops up a big warning the moment it identifies the download as malicious. Every malware sample whose URL wasn't blocked by SiteAdvisor got caught as a dangerous download. Sometimes the warning came the moment the download began, other times at the end of the process, but it always came. The only samples that got past McAfee were a couple of the commercial keyloggers.
Next, I opened a folder containing already-downloaded samples. A single click on a sample was enough to trigger McAfee's real-time scan. It identified and removed over 90 percent of the samples, asking for permission to remove those classified as "potentially unwanted programs." None of the remaining samples installed successfully, though a couple managed to place executable files on the system. A repeat test using hand-modified copies of each file got exactly the same results.
I did note one odd occurrence. Several times McAfee popped up a box announcing that it could not remove "this program" and suggesting that I use Add/Remove programs. This could make sense if the program in question was installed and running, but all of these samples were static files. And why didn't it say which program it meant?
McAfee used to include a feature called SystemGuards which asked the user whether to allow certain sensitive system changes made by any program, good or bad. With its current Active Protection and other layers of technology in place McAfee felt free to jettison the annoying SystemGuards—hooray!
McAfee scored very well in the malware blocking test, with 9.5 of 10 possible points, though others squeaked out even better scores. Panda Cloud Antivirus Free Edition 1.0 and PC Tools both got 9.7, while Norton scored 9.6.
I also tested McAfee's ability to block installation of keyloggers. Its score of 7.4 points is well above average but it doesn't approach the 9.0 points scored by Double Anti-Spy and Panda Cloud AntiVirus. And of course, good or bad the keylogger score isn't nearly as important as the full-scale malware score.
At 7.9 points, McAfee scored above average at blocking rootkits, but it was handily beaten by Panda Cloud Antivirus, with 10.0 points. Along with eight other products McAfee blocked every single scareware sample, for a perfect 10.
McAfee AntiVirus Plus is definitely better at keeping malware out of a clean system than at cleaning up an entrenched malware infestation, especially considering the problems it had even installing on a system where malware was already dug in. If you can get your system clean, McAfee will keep it that way.
Significant Bonus Features
As always, you can link directly from McAfee to online resources that include the company's interactive virus map, anti-hacker community, and virus information library. But there's more, much more, to merit the "Plus" in this product's name.
To start, it includes a fully functional firewall, one that passed all my standard firewall tests handily. A network map feature easily identifies other McAfee-equipped computers on your network and can even be configured to fix any security problems remotely. McAfee's venerable QuickClean system tune-up utility is also included, as is a "shredder" to securely delete sensitive documents.
The firewall and other bonus features would normally be found in a suite, not a standalone antivirus, so their presence adds significant value. I'll go into full detail about these features in my coming review of McAfee Total Protection 2010.
For those with McAfee VirusScan Plus already installed, the upgrade to McAfee AntiVirus Plus 2010 will bring even better protection against malware attacks along with an attractive, streamlined user interface. Those looking to install this product on a hitherto-unprotected system may have some challenges, though McAfee offers many tools to overcome these. It's a very good antivirus with some surprising bonus features.
7 komentar :
manaia bagus mcafee ato avg cikali??
http://mangkasarakku.blogspot.com/
thank gan infonya.. salam kenal.. ;) http://interisty.wordpress.com/
*lanjut baca koran pagi hari :mregren:
Trims informasinya brow. Tapi lebih bagus yang mana neh McAfee, Avira ato yang mana
@To Mangkasara'...
@MUBAROK...
@muhammadzakariah...
@hiabrother...
maaf baru sempat balas comment nya gan...
sedikit review bt rekan2
dari sisi penelitian dikatakan spt ini...McAfee dukup menguras memory sehingga kinerja PC/NB akan melambat...sementara AVG lumayan di bawahnya...demikian pula tuk AVIRA dan yg lainnya...
dari sisi keampuhan...dgn pengalaman memakai McAfee dan AVG,coba QT bandingkan...ternyata AVG lebih ampuh menangani virus khususnya Malware...tapi perlu pula diketahui bahwa McAfee&AVG punya kehebatan menangani virus internasional alias dari luar. sementara tuk kategori lokal alias nasional...saat ini QT kenal SMADAV dan PCMAV. Makanya dalam PC/NB perlu menghadirkan keduanya...versi nasional dan internasional.
AVG 9 berdasarkan hasil pemakaian Ambae.exe, ternyata mampu mendeteksi dan mengkarantina bahkan Cleaning dgn baik pd beberapa Malware. Kunci keberhasilannya.....andai PC/NB uda parah krn kehadiran Malware...Install Ulang dulu OS-nya (tentunya Windows), kemudian sebelum Restart tuk pertama kali, cepat2 install AVG 9, mutakhirkan updatenya dan scan keseluruhan Drive. Tujuannya agar AVG tidak terlanjur terinfeksi sebagai Program Berbahaya krn Virus telah mengambil alih System.
Salah satu kehebatan McAfee yakni bilamana berhasil mendeteksi sebuah file yg terinfeksi, maka McAfee tidak akan langsung menghapusnya tp berusaha Cleaning...AV yg lain pun seperti itu...tp sebagian besar justru membuat file tsb tidak dapat lg digunakan alias BROKEN...Maka akan sangat mengganggu bila file itu berupa "Setup.exe"
Nah, gimana dengan versi terbaru dari McAfee ini...sabar dl sobat...lazim sebuah software terbaru msh uji publik...jadi belum dpt diambil kesimpulan sejauh mana efektifitasnya. Satu hal yg ditunjukkan McAfee yakni ketersediaan update minimal 2x24 jam diharapkan mampu meng-cover virus yg terus bermunculan.
olehnya, review di atas bukan maksud mengarahkan tuk menggunakan McAfee saja. Mengingat tiap AV punya keampuhan tersendiri dlm menangani Virus. Bisa saja muncul virus "A" yg hanya mampu diatasi McAfee atau mungkin jg hanya AVG, AVIRA dan sebagainya yg berhasil mengatasi virus "B". Sementara McAfee cukup mendeteksinya saja tanpa bisa berbuat apa-apa.
Intinya...gunakan AV sesuai kebutuhan dalam menangani virus. Kemudian pertimbangkan pula kinerja komputer saat menggunakannya.
Virus dan anti virus satu kawanan yang hanya mencari income dengan memperdayai konsumen
@wahyu...
benar bget sobat
keduanya saling berkaitan
ada yg menyerang
trus yg satunya datang sbg Tabib
konsumenlah yg jadi korban
This blog is really very helpful but still if you have any issues with McAfee, so you can contact McAfee Antivirus Support Number. Our experts help you and solve your problems instant.
Post a Comment
Your comments are inputs for our